Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Colonoscopy in patients over 80 years of age. Indications, methods and results].

Authors: E M, Fontagnier; B C, Manegold;

[Colonoscopy in patients over 80 years of age. Indications, methods and results].

Abstract

Diseases of the colon, especially cancer, are age-specific and thus occur more frequently in an aging population. Early diagnosis is prognostically decisive. Indications for coloscopy are often delayed in the elderly. It was the aim of this study to determine advantages and disadvantages of coloscopy in those aged over 80 years.A total of 157 coloscopies in patients aged over 80 years (average 83 years, oldest patient 94 years) were retrospectively analysed (63 males, 94 females) regarding indications, results and complications, with special reference to cancer of the colon. The main indication for coloscopy in this cohort was occult faecal blood or non-acute rectal bleeding (27%), which together were important indicators of endoscopically significant findings (in 76%). Not only blood in the stool but manifold other signs can point to colorectal carcinoma.Even in patients aged over 80 years coloscopy is a safe and well-tolerated investigation. Its results can be improved by thorough pre-investigational intestinal preparation so that repeat examination is unnecessary. The high incidence of significant findings and the easy accessibility to the site of colon cancer should provide an earlier and more common indication of total coloscopy in this age group.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Patient Selection, Colonoscopy, Procedural Sedation, Cross-Sectional Studies, Germany, Occult Blood, Humans, Female, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!