
handle: 11104/0314366
Recently, the amount of generated time series data has been increasing rapidly in many areas such as healthcare, security, meteorology and others. However, it is very rare that those time series are annotated. For this reason, unsupervised machine learning techniques such as anomaly detection are often used with such data. There exist many unsupervised algorithms for anomaly detection ranging from simple statistical techniques such as moving average or ARIMA till complex deep learning algorithms such as LSTM-autoencoder. For a nice overview of the recent algorithms we refer to read. Difficulties with the unsupervised approach are: defining an anomaly score to correctly represent how anomalous is the time series, and setting a threshold for that score to distinguish between normal and anomaly data. Supervised anomaly detection, on the other hand, needs an expensive involvement of a human expert. An additional problem with supervised anomaly detection is usually the occurrence of very low ratio of anomalies, yielding highly imbalanced data. In this extended abstract, we propose an active learning extension for an anomaly detector based on a LSTM-autoencoder. It performs active learning using various classification algorithms and addresses data imbalance with oversampling and under-sampling techniques. We are currently testing it on the ECG5000 dataset from the UCR time series classification archive.\n
LSTM-Autoencoder, Time series, Active Learning, Anomaly detection
LSTM-Autoencoder, Time series, Active Learning, Anomaly detection
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
