
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Repository of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Conference object . 2015
Data sources: Repository of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Please grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
All Research products
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu
Please grant OpenAIRE to access and update your ORCID works.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Porovnání technik pro stanovení monoterpenů v lese
Authors: Křůmal, K. (Kamil); Večeřová, K. (Kristýna); Holišová, P. (Petra); Urban, O. (Otmar); Pallozzi, E.; Guidolotti, G.; Calfapietra, C.; +1 Authors
Křůmal, K. (Kamil); Večeřová, K. (Kristýna); Holišová, P. (Petra); Urban, O. (Otmar); Pallozzi, E.; Guidolotti, G.; Calfapietra, C.; Večeřa, Z. (Zbyněk);
handle: 11104/0246224
Abstract
In this work three different techniques (1 online and 2 offline) for determination of monoterpenes in forest were compared. Monoterpenes were determined by PTR-MS (Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometer), cylindrical wet effluent diffusion denuders and tenax tubes.
Country
Czech Republic
Related Organizations
- Czech Academy of Sciences Czech Republic
- Academy of Sciences Library Czech Republic
Keywords
monoterpenes, tenax, denuder
monoterpenes, tenax, denuder
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!

Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
Citations provided by BIP!
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
popularity
Popularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
0
Average
Average
Average
In this work three different techniques (1 online and 2 offline) for determination of monoterpenes in forest were compared. Monoterpenes were determined by PTR-MS (Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometer), cylindrical wet effluent diffusion denuders and tenax tubes.