<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 11104/0212092
This paper deals with an evaluation of the surface roughness quality created by abrasive water jet and by CO2 laser, in terms of influence of the selected technological parameters on the final quality of machined surfaces. The main objective of these experimental studies was to consider the use of both technologies for cutting of difficult to cut materials. Experiments presented in the paper were carried out on titanium ASTM B265-99 samples. The machined surfaces of samples were measured by an optical profilometer. Subsequently, selected topographical characteristics were studied. The obtained data were used for comparison of surface roughness parameters Ra in different depths. Based on achieved results the comparison of both technologies was made.
CO2 laser beam cutting, titanium sample, optical profilometry, abrasive waterjet cutting
CO2 laser beam cutting, titanium sample, optical profilometry, abrasive waterjet cutting
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |