Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Poor response in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia and erythroblastic or megakaryocytic dysplasia to treatment with standard doses of cytosine arabinoside and daunorubicin].

Authors: P, Lemez; J, Gáliková; T, Haas;

[Poor response in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia and erythroblastic or megakaryocytic dysplasia to treatment with standard doses of cytosine arabinoside and daunorubicin].

Abstract

Erythroid and/or megakaryocytic dysplasia (EMD) was evaluated in diagnostic bone marrow smears of 37 consecutively treated cases with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M0-M2 and M4-M5 types and three newly diagnosed cases of refractory anaemia with excess of blasts in transformation. This evaluation was possible in 38 of 40 (95%) patients and 17 cases were categorized without EMD and 21 cases with EMD. One or two cycles with 3-4 doses of daunorubicin 45 mg/m2/d and cytosine arabinoside 200 mg/m2/12 h x 14 lead to complete remission in 13 of 16 cases without EMD but only in 4 of 16 cases with EMD (p = 0.004). However, 10 of 13 patients with EMD reached complete remission with 2000 mg/m2/12 h x 10 of cytosine arabinoside plus daunorubicin. After intensive consolidations 20 patients under 65 years with EMD showed significantly worse overall survival (p = 0.017) with a median 11.5 months, while the median survival was estimated 66.8 months in 15 cases under 65 years without EMD. The proposed categorization of de novo AML patients according to the EMD seems to be useful for selection of optimal induction therapy, clinically relevant for survival and might reflect two biologic groups of AML arising in two different stages of differentiation.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts, Adolescent, Erythroblasts, Daunorubicin, Cytarabine, Middle Aged, Bone Marrow, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute Disease, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Megakaryocytes, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!