Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Examination of the image quality from digital fluoroscopy equipment with 1k- and 2k-image matrix].

Authors: G, Kunz; H P, Busch;

[Examination of the image quality from digital fluoroscopy equipment with 1k- and 2k-image matrix].

Abstract

The image quality of 1k- and 2k-radiographs from digital fluoroscopy equipments (Sireskop SX and Polystar SX--Siemens) are characterized by comparison with each other to evaluate the relevance of this technique in clinical routine.We examined fabricated and evaluated images with 1k- and 2k-image matrix from several high and low contrast phantoms and from skeleton phantoms. On the one hand, the digital image values can be used directly for the evaluation, on the other hand the comparing evaluation by experienced radiologists resulted from a visual consideration in a blind study.The quality difference of the 1k- and 2k-images depends mainly on the distance of the investigated sector of the object to the image intensifier and on the scattering of the radiation in the object positioned between the investigated sector and the image intensifier. The nearer the investigated object is located to the intensifier and the smaller the radiation is scattered in the object, the more the image quality of a radiograph with a 2k-matrix is increasing in comparison to an image with 1k-matrix. The higher the tube voltage, the smaller are the differences.The image quality enhancement because of the more sensitive sampling of the Saticon target in the 2k-matrix is limited by the opening of the iris positioned in the light distributor. Therefore the image quality differences of medical 1k- and 2k-radiographs in many cases are small.

Keywords

Phantoms, Imaging, Fluoroscopy, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Scattering, Radiation, Radiation Dosage, Bone and Bones

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!