Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Use of monoclonal fluorescent antibodies for the detection of B. pertussis and B. parapertussis.

Authors: A J, Stadel;

Use of monoclonal fluorescent antibodies for the detection of B. pertussis and B. parapertussis.

Abstract

While it has been said that PCR is likely to replace DFA as the test of choice, accessibility to and cost of the technique may limit the number of laboratories that are able to implement the process. Still, the advantage of DFA staining relative to other diagnostic methods, including PCR, is the provision of a rapid result and lower overall cost. The laboratory diagnosis of pertussis remains problematic, and polyclonal DFA reagents for its detection have brought into question the utility of DFA. However, the integration of a commercially available monoclonal DFA reagent, in combination with the development and standardization of existing procedures, should provide clinicians with an improved method for the diagnosis and epidemiology of pertussis.

Keywords

Bordetella, Whooping Cough, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sensitivity and Specificity, Bordetella pertussis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!