
handle: 10986/35373
In 2009, the G-20 in London recommended that accounting standard setters, strengthen accounting recognition of loan-loss provisions by incorporating a broader range of credit information (G20 2009). In response, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (IFRS 9) in July 2014, it became effective in 2018. This paper relies on a survey and bilateral meetings with prudential supervisors. This paper deals with the expected credit loss framework, with a particular focus on EMDEs. In 2020, EMDEs were facing challenges when dealing with IFRS 9 during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, given the unprecedented reversals in capital flows as global risk appetite declined. EMDEs are coping with weaker health care systems and more limited fiscal space to provide support. Based on the experience of the surveyed countries and their reflections on challenges and potential remedies that they used while implementing the IFRS 9 accounting framework, the authors identified a set of high level policy recommendations for prudential supervisors in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) willing to transition to IFRS 9. The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the survey results; Section 3 presents policy recommendations for supervisory authorities in countries that implemented IFRS 9 as well as in countries that are still in the process of IFRS 9 implementation; and Section 4 offers conclusions.
330, LOAN LOSS PROVISION, BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION, PRUDENTIAL REGULATIONS, FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT, INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS, 650, ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
330, LOAN LOSS PROVISION, BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION, PRUDENTIAL REGULATIONS, FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT, INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS, 650, ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
