Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Open Knowledge Repos...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Open Knowledge Repository
Research . 2014
License: CC BY
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Right to Information

Authors: Trapnell, Stephanie E.; Lemieux, Victoria L.;

Right to Information

Abstract

The findings from the study suggest that international pressure for more effective Right to Information (RTI) implementation only goes so far. The development of RTI laws with the encouragement, assistance, or insistence of the international community was a prominent theme throughout the case studies, particularly for EU countries during their accession process. But implementation is a less straightforward task, with many interlocking, moving parts, and international support comes in ad hoc fashion as the process unfolds. A strong implication from these findings is that a national coordinating strategy may be valuable for implementation. This kind of strategy document should take the interdependence of the drivers of effectiveness into account when drafting policies and rules for practice, and can serve as a guiding document when deciding on foreign funding priorities.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

PORTALS, RESEARCHER, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION NEEDS, SOCIAL SCIENCE, INFORMATION, INVESTMENT, TRAINING EVENTS, CULTURAL NORMS, GENERALIZATIONS, CASE, SOFTWARE, COMMUNICATION, DATABASES, DECISION-MAKING, DESCRIPTION, INFORMATION CENTER, DECISION- MAKING, TRAINING PROGRAMS, KNOWLEDGE BASE, TELECOMMUNICATION, PROGRAMS, PROJECTS, BINDING, WEBSITES, POLITICAL SYSTEMS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTERS, SITES, CONTENT, CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICERS, CONTENTS, PLANNING, SITE, USABILITY, CITATION, SCIENCE, CLASSIFYING, ADMINISTRATIONS, GROUPS, LIBRARY, DESIGNATION, TRAINING PROVIDERS, TECHNOLOGIES, BUREAUCRATIC RESISTANCE, EXTRACTING, NATIONAL ARCHIVES, INFORMATION SERVICES, USERS, STANDARDS, REPOSITORY, STORAGE, READING, TELEVISION, PARTNERS, DOMAINS, 330, MODELS, CASES, DEMOCRACY, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, CLASSIFICATION, MEDIA, MANAGEMENT INFORMATION, CONCEPT, DOCUMENT, PLANS, COLLECTIVE ACTION, E-GOVERNANCE, INFORMATION CENTERS, ANNUAL REPORTS, REGULATORY REFORM, CATALOGING, GENERALIZATION, LITERACY, INFORMATION OFFICERS, SERVICES, ARCHIVES, SCIENTISTS, E-GOVERNMENT, CULTURAL CHANGE, BUREAUCRACIES, SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, PHONES, USE OF INFORMATION, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION, ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT, DISCLOSURE, DATA, RESEARCH, FUNDING, COLLABORATION, EMAIL, DATA SOURCES, ARTICLES, STANDARD, DOMAIN, PARTNERSHIPS, DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE, ABSTRACTION, ACCESS TO RECORDS, INDEX, CATALOGS, ACCESS TO INFORMATION, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, POLICY, USER, REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, WEB, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT, PROBABILITY, INFORMATION ACCESS, ENTRY, SKILLS, BULLETIN BOARDS, POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS, RESEARCHERS, ARCHIVE, PROTOCOLS, CONCEPTS, TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS, TRAINING, DATABASE, PARTICIPATION, NATIONAL LIBRARY, PUBLIC RELATIONS, ADMINISTRATION, LEARNING, INNOVATIONS, EXPERTS, ARRANGEMENTS, KNOWLEDGE, TECHNOLOGY, ARTICLE, CONTENT ANALYSIS, INTERNET, POLITICS, REPOSITORIES, ACCESSION, RADIO, OBJECT, DOCUMENTS, PUBLISHING, INFORMATION EXCHANGE, DESCRIPTIONS, INDICES, LIBRARIES, FILING, ICT, ANNUAL REPORT, DISCLOSURES, DATA COLLECTION, LAW, USER GROUPS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities