
To analyze retrospectively the data base of the French national vigilance reporting system concerning infusion devices during the year 1998.Each report has been reviewed and classified, except implantable catheter ports.The study included 309 reports. Among them, 28% concerned infusion pumps and 72% single use devices, i.e. catheters, infusion lines, taps, connectors, etc. We observed six deaths and 23 severe incidents. Only 25% of devices could be formally investigated by manufacturers. The origins of incidents were very different between infusion pumps and single use devices. The first showed simple failures, software errors, maintenance omissions or errors, and problems related to obsolescence of the device. The second revealed manufacturer quality insurance failures, design and utilization errors, and problems related to the technique itself rather than device.Our findings are similar to the few data available in international literature. They address the need to obtain an adequacy between the performances of devices which vary with generations of devices and the clinical risks: newest and safest devices should be preferred for the infusion of the most critical drugs.
Risk Management, Syringes, Catheterization, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Humans, Equipment Failure, Infusions, Parenteral, France, Mortality, Safety, Infusion Pumps, Retrospective Studies
Risk Management, Syringes, Catheterization, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Humans, Equipment Failure, Infusions, Parenteral, France, Mortality, Safety, Infusion Pumps, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
