Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Perfusion instruments: analysis of product surveillance in 1998 and its on-the-job training. Subcommittee 4b for Product Surveillance].

Authors: F, Conreux; A M, Guilleux; L, Beydon; J B, Cazalàa; S, Fougère;

[Perfusion instruments: analysis of product surveillance in 1998 and its on-the-job training. Subcommittee 4b for Product Surveillance].

Abstract

To analyze retrospectively the data base of the French national vigilance reporting system concerning infusion devices during the year 1998.Each report has been reviewed and classified, except implantable catheter ports.The study included 309 reports. Among them, 28% concerned infusion pumps and 72% single use devices, i.e. catheters, infusion lines, taps, connectors, etc. We observed six deaths and 23 severe incidents. Only 25% of devices could be formally investigated by manufacturers. The origins of incidents were very different between infusion pumps and single use devices. The first showed simple failures, software errors, maintenance omissions or errors, and problems related to obsolescence of the device. The second revealed manufacturer quality insurance failures, design and utilization errors, and problems related to the technique itself rather than device.Our findings are similar to the few data available in international literature. They address the need to obtain an adequacy between the performances of devices which vary with generations of devices and the clinical risks: newest and safest devices should be preferred for the infusion of the most critical drugs.

Keywords

Risk Management, Syringes, Catheterization, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Humans, Equipment Failure, Infusions, Parenteral, France, Mortality, Safety, Infusion Pumps, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!