
To decide whether the transitory coexpression of cone visual pigments described in the developing rat and gerbil retina is a universal feature of dichromatic mammalian species.The rabbit, a species widely used in eye research, was selected for the study and a search made for the presence of cones that bound more than one cone antibody during the first postnatal week. To plot the densities of individual cone types and to colocalize the two visual pigments, immunocytochemistry on retinal wholemounts and consecutive tangential sections, respectively, were used.The sequence in which the visual pigments began to be expressed was the same as that observed in other mammals: first, rhodopsin; second, blue pigment; and last, green pigment. The striking increase in blue cone density numbers observed in the rat, however, did not occur in the rabbit. Instead, some days after the first blue cones appeared, the green cones also started to express their visual pigment, and this cone type soon outnumbered the blue cones. Within the limits of the immunocytochemical method, it was established that unlike the developing rat, the presence of double-labeled cones was not a character of the rabbit retina.Visual pigment coexpression is an interesting phenomenon of retinal development, however, it is not the exclusive scenario of photoreceptor differentiation. Each species must be carefully studied before deciding whether its retinal cones synthesize both pigments during retinal development.
Immunoenzyme Techniques, 570, Animals, Newborn, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, 610, Animals, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Rabbits, Retinal Pigments
Immunoenzyme Techniques, 570, Animals, Newborn, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, 610, Animals, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Rabbits, Retinal Pigments
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
