
It is unclear which diagnostic procedure is optimal for the detection of common bile duct stones prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It is routine to use blood tests for liver function and transabdominal ultrasound, and the best method is currently to continue evaluation with other methods when one or more blood tests for liver function are elevated and/or the diameter of the common bile duct is > or = 10 mm on transabdominal ultrasound. Magnetic resonance cholangiography, endoscopic ultrasound, laparoscopic ultrasound, intraoperative cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography are all accurate in the detection of common bile duct stones. Intravenous cholangiography and computer tomography needs further evaluation before final recommendations can be made. Intraoperative cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography have the best documentation available in the literature. Intraoperative cholangiography is easy, cheap and without significant complications, whereas endoscopic retrograde cholangiography has a high morbidity and mortality rate. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is therefore not suitable as a diagnostic test and should be abandoned as such in the future. Patients with cholangitis, jaundice and common bile duct stones visualised by transabdominal ultrasound have a high risk of common bile duct stones, and these patients can therefore undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiography directly. Other patients should have a magnetic resonance cholangiography or endoscopic ultrasound preoperatively, or intraoperative cholangiography or laparoscopic ultrasound depending on local factors such as available equipment and surgical expertise.
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Gallstones, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Liver Function Tests, Cholelithiasis, Preoperative Care, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cholangiography, Ultrasonography
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Gallstones, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Liver Function Tests, Cholelithiasis, Preoperative Care, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cholangiography, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
