Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

CLIL AND ITS EFFECTS IN NON-CLIL SUBJECTS

Authors: Cabrerizo Reyes, Elisabeth;

CLIL AND ITS EFFECTS IN NON-CLIL SUBJECTS

Abstract

[EN]The present paper compares the possible differences in anxiety and level of preparation between a group of CLIL and a group of traditional students. The observation that CLIL students may have a bigger academic load than non-CLIL students is the starting point of this study. This academic load could influence in a negative form the group of CLIL students. Both groups of students completed two of the following official tests: Cuestionario de ansiedad infantil, Cuestionario de ansiedad infantil de Spence, Cuestioanrio de hábitos y técnicas de estudio; in which the object of analysis was the difference scores of each of the tests. The results, which were not significant, revealed that CLIL learners obtained a lower level of anxiety and of preparation than non-CLIL students and provided evidence of growing advantages within CLIL students’ and broadened their experiences. Furthermore, results revealed some interesting correlations between the time of preparation for a certain subject and the anxiety level of the students.

[ES]Este estudio pretende comparar las posibles diferencias en los niveles de ansiedad y preparación entre un grupo AICLE y uno tradicional de estudiantes. La investigación parte de la observación de la carga académica de los alumnos AICLE, lo que puede tener cierta influencia negativa para éstos. Ambos grupos completaron dos de los siguientes tests oficiales: Cuestionario de ansiedad infantil, Cuestionario de ansiedad infantil de Spence, Cuestionario de hábitos y técnicas de estudio; de los cuales, las diferentes puntuaciones de cada uno de ellos serán nuestro objeto de estudio. Los resultados, que no reúnen los requisitos para ser considerados significativos, revelan que los estudiantes AICLE tienen un menor nivel de ansiedad y preparación que los no-AICLE, y nos muestran una creciente ventaja con el incremento de la experiencia de los estudiantes. Asimismo, una interesante correlación entre el tiempo de preparación y el nivel de la ansiedad del estudiante puede apreciarse.

Keywords

5701.11, Enseñanza de lenguas, Teaching of languages

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green