
handle: 10945/66113
This research investigates potential correlation between Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)-required Earned Value Management System (EVMS) compliance reviews and their effect on contractor Earned Value Management (EVM) performance and data integrity metrics. The primary objective is to determine if the 2015 DFARS deviation, which raised the dollar-value threshold for EVMS compliance reviews from $50M to $100M, and the resultant reduction in government oversight had any impact'positive or negative'on contractor performance. The authors examined EVM data for contracts requiring EVMS compliance reviews, data integrity metrics, and performance data on programs with varying dollar values for identifiable outcomes from the 2015 DFARS class deviation. The results of the study revealed that neither the 2015 DFARS class deviation nor the presence or absence of EVMS compliance reviews had a discernible impact on contractors' EV performance, EVM data integrity, or on their ability to perform on the contract.
Approved for public release. distribution is unlimited
Civilian, Office of the Secretary of Defense
Earned Value Management, earned value compliance threshold change, earned value compliance review threshold change, earned value, earned value data, earned value compliance review, effect of earned value threshold change, EVMS, effect of earned value compliance review threshold change, EVM, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, DFARS, Earned Value Management System, earned value compliance threshold, earned value data integrity
Earned Value Management, earned value compliance threshold change, earned value compliance review threshold change, earned value, earned value data, earned value compliance review, effect of earned value threshold change, EVMS, effect of earned value compliance review threshold change, EVM, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, DFARS, Earned Value Management System, earned value compliance threshold, earned value data integrity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
