
handle: 10945/62859
The purpose of this research is to analyze and measure the effectiveness of the guidance for identification, development, certification, and management of contracting officer’s representatives (CORs) within the Department of Defense (DoD) in comparison to Federal Acquisition Certification for Contracting Officer’s Representatives (FAC-CORs). The research team utilized responses from the DoD COR Competencies Survey and provided recommendations on its findings to improve training and technical competency structures in order to leverage best practices from the FAC-COR structures. Although the research did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in proficiencies between DoD-CORs and FAC-CORs, the results demonstrated a strong correlation between time-spent and proficiencies, which allows for areas of further research. Regarding the proficiencies of the DoD-CORs and FAC-CORs, it is evident that there are areas the DoD can improve through coordination with FAC-CORs and Federal Acquisition Institute.
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
http://archive.org/details/acomparativeanal1094562859
Civilian, Department of the Navy
Civilian, Department of the Army
competencies, training, Contracting Officer's Representative, Federal Acquisition Institute, Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act
competencies, training, Contracting Officer's Representative, Federal Acquisition Institute, Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
