Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Extended segmentectomy for small lung tumors].

Authors: N, Tsubota; K, Yoshikawa;

[Extended segmentectomy for small lung tumors].

Abstract

To identify the benefits of limited surgery on small-sized lung tumors, the following subjects are discussed: 1) an updated report from a prospective group study (January 1992-December 1994) for extended segmentectomy for small lung tumors (n = 55); 2) a histopathological study of resected adenocarcinoma specimens less than 2 cm in size (n = 94), proposed by Noguchi; and 3) lung function after limited surgery and the quality of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.1) Among 10 deaths, 4 patients died of their disease including one with local recurrence. The survival rate at 5 years was 91%, not including 6 unrelated deaths. 2) Of 94 patients, twelve with localized bronchioalveolar tumors (type A and B), and 23 of 57 patients with active fibroblastic proliferation (type C), underwent extended segmentectomy. Those 35 patients are all free of disease. The remaining 59 patients had a 70% 5-year survival rate. 3) Forced vital capacity was maintained at 92% of the preoperative level, which was much better than 81% for patients undergoing lobectomy. Card-sized thoracotomy using a thoracoscope was carried out in 92 patients, including 21 patients who underwent segmentectomy, in a series of 175 consecutive lung cancer operations. This approach resulted in less bleeding, the same operating time, and better preservation of vital capacity.Extended segmentectomy for small lung tumors did not affect the prognosis, and was associated with a better quality of life postoperatively.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Lung Neoplasms, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Vital Capacity, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Pneumonectomy, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!