
To identify the benefits of limited surgery on small-sized lung tumors, the following subjects are discussed: 1) an updated report from a prospective group study (January 1992-December 1994) for extended segmentectomy for small lung tumors (n = 55); 2) a histopathological study of resected adenocarcinoma specimens less than 2 cm in size (n = 94), proposed by Noguchi; and 3) lung function after limited surgery and the quality of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.1) Among 10 deaths, 4 patients died of their disease including one with local recurrence. The survival rate at 5 years was 91%, not including 6 unrelated deaths. 2) Of 94 patients, twelve with localized bronchioalveolar tumors (type A and B), and 23 of 57 patients with active fibroblastic proliferation (type C), underwent extended segmentectomy. Those 35 patients are all free of disease. The remaining 59 patients had a 70% 5-year survival rate. 3) Forced vital capacity was maintained at 92% of the preoperative level, which was much better than 81% for patients undergoing lobectomy. Card-sized thoracotomy using a thoracoscope was carried out in 92 patients, including 21 patients who underwent segmentectomy, in a series of 175 consecutive lung cancer operations. This approach resulted in less bleeding, the same operating time, and better preservation of vital capacity.Extended segmentectomy for small lung tumors did not affect the prognosis, and was associated with a better quality of life postoperatively.
Adult, Male, Lung Neoplasms, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Vital Capacity, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Pneumonectomy, Aged
Adult, Male, Lung Neoplasms, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Vital Capacity, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Pneumonectomy, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
