Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Trimethoprim-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in urinary tract infection.

Authors: C K, Wong; G K, Harding; A R, Ronald; S, Hoban;

Trimethoprim-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in urinary tract infection.

Abstract

The incidence of trimethoprim-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has not increased since the introduction of the combination trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) into the clinical use at our centre in 1973. Using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as the index of trimethoprim resistance, this ranged from 1.6 to 800 mug/ml; for the majority of isolates it lay between 1.6 and 12.5 mug/ml. About half of these trimethoprim-resistant organisms were sensitive to sulfonamide. In vitro data suggest that organisms resistant to sulfonamide as well as to trimethoprim, where the MIC for the former drug is 3.1 mug/ml or less, will be susceptible to the combination. More resistant organisms, i.e., those for which the MIC of trimethoprim is 6.2 mug/ml or more, often appear quite resistent to the combination. There is no evidence that previous therapy with TMP-SMX is a significant predisposing factor to infection with these organisms, although there is a significant correlation between previous TMP-SMX therapy and infection with organisms with a high level of trimethoprim resistance. Organisms harbouring R-factor resistance or thymine-dependent mutants were not encountered during the course of this study.

Keywords

Male, Sulfamethoxazole, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Proteus, Trimethoprim, Klebsiella Infections, Drug Combinations, Klebsiella, Urinary Tract Infections, Escherichia coli, Humans, Female, Proteus Infections, Escherichia coli Infections

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!