Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Tidsskrift for Den n...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

[Teledermatology--experiences from Northern Norway].

Authors: D, Moseng;

[Teledermatology--experiences from Northern Norway].

Abstract

Distant diagnosing by two-way interactive motion video (videoconference) appeared in the 1980s, the last four years with weekly teleconsultations to Hammerfest and Kirkenes.Patients are mostly referred from general practitioners. A physician with a 20% position is responsible for organising the videoconferences and participates in the consultation. A close-up camera is used for detailed examination of skin lesions. Photographs of skin areas may be transmitted directly to the specialist screen (still images). The studio physician writes prescriptions and sick leave notes. The specialist writes a reply to the referring physician. Referrals using still images are as yet at a pilot stage.Patients view early diagnosis, time saved, reduced costs, and less need for leave from work as important advantages with videoconferences. Patient satisfaction is high, although 10% are dissatisfied. Having a physician in the studio makes patients feel safer, and they understand the specialist better. This is a new role for the specialist; the doctor/patient relationship is often taken care of by the studio physician. Comparisons between videoconference and face-to-face consultations have shown up to 90% diagnostic agreement. A pilot study using still image referrals showed similar results.Videoconferences are well suited in everyday dermatology, when follow-up by specialist is necessary, and for patients in regular treatment at local clinics for skin disease. Still image referral seems promising. The studio physician's diagnostic abilities are enhanced. Many patients are not suited for teleconsultation, but telemedical solutions will have a role in the years to come.

Keywords

Physician-Patient Relations, Norway, Medically Underserved Area, Telepathology, Videotape Recording, Dermatology, Skin Diseases, Cost Savings, Patient Satisfaction, Humans, Referral and Consultation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Published in a Diamond OA journal