
To evaluate the accuracy of CT, ultrasonography and manual palpation in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis and to identify the value of CT and ultrasound in the diagnosis of occult cervical lymph node metastasis.Sixty patients (74 sides) were studied double-blindedly by CT and ultrasonography prior to cervical lymphadenectomy, and the results were correlated with histo-pathologic findings.According to histologic examination of the dissected specimens, in 56 of 74 sides there were cervical lymph node metastases, 46 of the 56 sides with metastatic nodes were diagnosed by manual palpation(sensitivity, 82.1%; specificity, 83.3%; accuracy, 82.4%). However, lymphnode metastases in 53 sides were revealed by CT(sensitivity, 94.6%; specificity, 94.4%; accuracy, 94.6%), i.e., CT discovered 70% of the occult metastatic nodes in this series. Lymph node metastases were diagnosed accurately in 51 sides by ultrasonography (sensitivity, 91.1%; specificity, 94.4%; accuracy, 91.9%), and 50% of the occult metastatic nodes were found by ultrasound.CT, ultrasound examinations are superior to physical palpation in ascertaining cervical lymph node metastasis, as 50%-70% of the occult cervical metastatic nodes can be diagnosed.
Adult, Male, Palpation, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Double-Blind Method, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged, Ultrasonography
Adult, Male, Palpation, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Double-Blind Method, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
