Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Effects of temperature, light and nutrition on color and anthocyanin content of poinsettia bracts

Authors: Marousky, F. J.;

Effects of temperature, light and nutrition on color and anthocyanin content of poinsettia bracts

Abstract

Investigations were undertaken to establish an objective procedure for measuring the color of poinsettia bracts, to develop a method for quantitatively determining the concentration of bract anthocyanins, and to determine the effect of temperature, light intensity and nutrition on the color and the anthocyanin content of poinsettia bracts. A procedure was developed to objectively measure the color poinsettia bracts using the Hunter Color-Color Difference Meter. The Hunter Color-Color Difference Meter was effective in measuring subtle color differences not observable to the naked eye. The Hunter color values were calculated into Munsell color notations to provide standard color terms for poinsettia bracts. A method was developed to quantitatively determine the concentration of anthocyanins in poinsettia bracts. The aglycone fractions, pelargonidin and cyanidin of poinsettia anthocyanins were used for quantitative purposes rather than the actual glycosides. Pelargonidin was purified using standard chemical and chromatographic procedures. Pure cyanidin was obtained from a commercial company. The absorption maxima, specific absorption coefficients and the response of pure pelargonidin and cyanidin to Beer’s Law in amyl alcohol saturated with 2N HCl were determined. The amounts of pelargonidin and cyanidin in the same solution were calculated using the specific absorption coefficients and the optical densities obtained at the absorption maxima of each anthocyanidin. Pelargonidin and cyanidin were accurately measured to 0.1 milligram amounts per 50 milliliters of solvent. The effects of temperature, light intensity and nutrition on the color and anthocyanin content of Indianapolis Red poinsettias were determined. The results of these environmental studies may be summarized as follows: 1) Bracts grown at 55 F contained more anthocyanin than bracts grown at 62 and 70 F. The higher the temperature, the less anthocyanin produced per unit bract are; hence, the less “red” colored were the bracts. Bracts grown at 70 and 62 F changed in red coloration proportionately to changes in anthocyanin concentration per unit area of bract; hence, bracts grown at high temperatures were less “red” colored. Changes in bract coloration were due to changes in cyanidin glycosides rather than pelargonidin glycosides. Bracts grown at 70 F and moved to 55 F during the final two weeks of growth were more “red” and contained more anthocyanin than the bracts kept at 70 F. 2) Light was necessary for anthocyanin formation in poinsettia bracts. The amount of anthocyanin accumulated in bracts was dependent on the amount of sunlight incident to the bracts. Bracts grown at high intensity contained more anthocyanin and were more “red” than bracts grown at low light intensity. The amount of anthocyanin produced in bracts at a given light intensity was controlled by the prevailing night temperature. 3) Bracts grown at combinations of each of the 3 levels of nitrogen and potassium produced slight changes in color and anthocyanin content in bracts. Potassium did not influence anthocyanin content of bracts. There was less anthocyanin produced per unit bract area at low nitrogen regimes than at medium or high nitrogen regimes. The differences in anthocyanin content per unit bract area were not great enough to cause significant changes in bract color. 4) Results for bracts grown at varying temperatures and light intensity regimes indicate that there is a relationship for anthocyanin accumulation to bract dry weight. Bract dry weight-anthocyanin relationship was somewhat obscure for bracts grown at varying nitrogen and potassium regimes.

Ph. D.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

LD5655.V856 1967.M37

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!