Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Designing for upper seam stability in multi-seam mining.

Authors: Zhou, Yingxin;

Designing for upper seam stability in multi-seam mining.

Abstract

The problem of interaction resulting from mining seams above a previously mined seam has been thoroughly investigated in order to develop and evaluate methods of improving upper seam ground conditions when mining through either active or passive subsidence waves. Design criteria have been developed based on results from case studies, statistical analyses, geological characterizations, numerical studies, and physical modeling. These include identification of critical factors, prediction of the location and magnitude of potential interaction areas, and remedial options. Complete design procedures have been devised which include five essential steps: data collection and mapping, classification of mining conditions, characterization of strata, preliminary evaluations, and stability analyses. The methods developed for interaction analysis are classified into two categories: qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative methods can be used for a preliminary evaluation using rules of thumb and empirical formulas developed from statistical analyses. Quantitative methods involve more detailed stress and strain computations based on quantified interaction mechanisms. These mechanisms include trough subsidence, load transfer, pressure arch, large scale caving and fracturing, and interseam failure. Finally, in order to expedite the transfer of research findings to the field for application, an interactive and comprehensive computer program has been developed which incorporates all possible interaction mechanisms and aspects of the design and evaluation process for multi-seam mining.

Ph. D.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

Pillaring (Mining), Mining engineering, LD5655.V856 1988.Z567

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!