Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Infection and development of Ustilago syntherismae in Digitaria ciliaris

Authors: Johnson, David Alan;

Infection and development of Ustilago syntherismae in Digitaria ciliaris

Abstract

Ustilsgo syntherismae (Schwein.) Peck, which causes loose smut of crabgrass, infects its host systemically and destroys seed production. Greenhouse experiments were carried out to investigate the mode of infection, the disease incidence that can be obtained by artificial inoculation and the conditions necessary for optimum infection, cross-infection on southern and smooth crabgrass, and the reasons for the late observance of the disease. U. syntherismse infected southern crabgrass, Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koeler, by both seed-borne and soil-borne teliospore inoculum. Disease incidence was high (84-91%) in some treatments. Higher rates of teliospore application resulted in larger percentages of smutted plants. When infesting the potting mixture, the highest percentages of smutted plants were obtained when infestation and planting were done at the same time. Earlier or later planting resulted in fewer smutted plants. When planting at various depths, greater numbers of smutted plants were obtained when inoculated seed were planted 0.5 to 1.0 cm below the surface versus planting on the surface or at greater depths. The appearance of 50% of infected plants' first panicles (in greenhouse experiments) was delayed by 4.5 weeks compared to the emergence (50%) of first panicles from healthy plants. In cross inoculation experiments, southern and smooth crabgrass plants developed smut only when inoculated with spores collected from large and smooth crabgrass~ respectively.

Master of Science

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

LD5655.V855 1990.J643, Crabgrass, Smut fungi

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!