Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Transcendence degree in power series rings.

Authors: Boyd, David Watts;

Transcendence degree in power series rings.

Abstract

Let D[[X]] be the ring of formal power series over the commutative integral domain D. Gilmer has shown that if K is the quotient field of D, then D[[X]] and K[[X]] have the same quotient field if and only if K[[X]] ~ D[[X]]D_(O). Further, if a is any nonzero element of D, Sheldon has shown that either D[l/a][[X]] and D[[X]] have the same quotient field, or the quotient field of D[l/a][[X]] has infinite transcendence degree over the quotient field of D[[X]]. In this paper, the relationship between D[[X]] and J[[X]] is investigated for an arbitrary overring J of D. If D is integrally closed, it is shown that either J[[X]] and D[[X]] have the same quotient field, or the quotient field of J[[X]] has infinite transcendence degree over the quotient field of D[[X]]. It is shown further, that D is completely integrally closed if and only if the quotient field of J[[X]] has infinite transcendence degree over the quotient field of D[[X]] for each proper overring J of D. Several related results are given; for example, if D is Noetherian, and if J is a finite ring extension of D, then either J[[X]] and D[[X]] have the same quotient field or the quotient field of J[[X]] has infinite transcendence degree over the quotient field of D[[X]]. An example is given to show that if D is not integrally closed, J[[X]] may be algebraic over D[[X]] while J[[X]] and ~[[X]] have dif~erent quotient fields.

Ph. D.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

LD5655.V856 1975.B695, Power series rings

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!