Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
VTechWorksarrow_drop_down
VTechWorks
Thesis . 2025
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: VTechWorks
addClaim

Reproductive Injustice: Abortion Restrictions and Maternal Mortality Rates

Authors: Ayala, Calinda Carolina;

Reproductive Injustice: Abortion Restrictions and Maternal Mortality Rates

Abstract

This research establishes a statistically significant connection between maternal mortality rates and abortion restrictions from a reproductive injustice perspective, integrating the theory of necropolitics. Using a time-series cross-sectional analysis of all 50 U.S. states from 2009 to 2019, this study highlights the impact of restrictive abortion policies during a period of intensified legislative activity, including pre-abortion counseling requirements, TRAP laws, and trigger laws. Data from the Guttmacher Institute's hostility scale and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation's maternal mortality statistics reveal that states with higher hostility toward abortion experienced increased maternal mortality. Notably, a 1% increase in state hostility is associated with a 0.45% rise in overall maternal mortality rates (p < 0.001). The analysis further demonstrates that each marginalized racial and ethnic group examined face heightened risks from higher abortion hostility, with maternal mortality rising among Hispanic women by 0.40% (p < 0.001); among non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaskan Native women increasing by 0.29% (p < 0.05); among non-Hispanic Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacfic Islander women by 0.53% (p < 0.001); and non-Hispanic Black women by 0.39% (p < 0.001) per 1% increase in state hostility. However, the largest increase was found among non-Hispanic White women (p < 0.001). This study contributes to reproductive justice scholarship by incorporating a feminist and sociological perspective on the relationship between abortion restrictions and maternal mortality, particularly as moderated by race and ethnicity. The findings call for urgent policy interventions to dismantle systemic inequities in healthcare access, ensuring the protection of reproductive rights and the reduction of maternal mortality across all communities.

This study explores how abortion restrictions affect maternal mortality rates in the United States, focusing on the period between 2009 and 2019. It shows that stricter abortion laws, such as requirements for pre-abortion counseling, targeted regulations on abortion providers, and laws designed to ban abortion if federal protections are overturned, are linked to higher maternal death rates. States with more restrictive abortion policies had notable increases in maternal mortality, with even greater risks for certain racial and ethnic groups. For example, for every 1% increase in state-level hostility toward abortion, overall maternal mortality rose by 0.45%. The impact was pronounced for Hispanic women, non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaskan Native women, non-Hispanic Black women, and non-Hispanic Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander women. Among non-Hispanic White women, the increase was even greater. By examining the relationship between abortion restrictions and maternal health through a feminist and sociological lens, this research highlights systemic inequalities in healthcare access. The findings emphasize the need for policies that protect reproductive rights and improve maternal health outcomes for all communities, especially those historically underserved.

Master of Science

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

necropolitics, feminist perspective, maternal mortality, reproductive injustice, Roe v Wade, hostility, bio-power, abortion

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!