Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Estimates of above-ground phytomass and nutrients in the understory vegetation in an Appalachian oak forest in Virginia

Authors: Martin, Wayne L.;

Estimates of above-ground phytomass and nutrients in the understory vegetation in an Appalachian oak forest in Virginia

Abstract

Destructive sampling was undertaken to estimate the contribution of the herb stratum and shrub stratum to above-ground phytomass and nutrients (N, P, K, Mg and Ca) in four different vegetation types in an Appalachian oak forest in southwestern Virginia. The study area is located at midslope on the southeast aspect of Potts Mountain in four non-contiguous compartments which are to be clearcut and whole-tree harvested in the near future. A partial random sampling scheme was utilized to select 20 x 20m study areas, within which 48 1 x 1 m and 16 5 x 5 m herb and shrub stratum plots were nested respectively. Statistical tests indicated that significant differences in above-ground phytomass and nutrients exist between vegetation types in both strata. The trend is towards greater amounts of understory vegetation on progressively drier sites. Total amounts (kg/ha) of nutrient elements show a similar trend. In contrast, nutrient element concentrations show a reverse trend, with higher concentrations of nutrients found on the more mesic sites. Ordination techniques were utilized to investigate differences in nutrient concentrations among species. Species groupings derived from the ordinations substantiated the sorting of vegetation types along a moisture gradient. Regression equations for individual

M. S.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

LD5655.V855 1979.M377, Forest management -- Virginia, Forest ecology, Logging -- Environmental aspects -- Virginia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!