
handle: 10902/21631
RESUMEN: El presente Trabajo Fin de Grado tiene por objeto analizar los principales pronunciamientos que ha adoptado el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en relación con el terrorismo en España. Analizaremos en especial, la trascendencia que tuvo en nuestro país la doctrina Parot, así como la cuestión de si los años de cumplimiento de condena en otro país deben ser tenidos en cuenta a la hora de cumplir el resto de la condena en el país de origen.
ABSTRACT: The objective of this end-course project is to analyze the main pronouncements adopted by the European Court of Human Rights related to terrorism in Spain. We will specifically analyze the significance it had in this country the Parot doctrine as well as the question of whether the years of serving a sentence in another country should be taken into account when serving the rest of the sentence in the country of origin.
Grado en Derecho
Doctrina Picabea, Picabea Doctrine, Parot’s Doctrine, Doctrina Parot, Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, European Court of Human Rights
Doctrina Picabea, Picabea Doctrine, Parot’s Doctrine, Doctrina Parot, Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, European Court of Human Rights
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
