Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Silicone tracheobronchial endoprosthesis].

Authors: M C, Dumon; J F, Dumon; C, Perrin; B, Blaive;

[Silicone tracheobronchial endoprosthesis].

Abstract

Silicone endoprostheses are used to replace loss of support in tracheobronchial cartilage. The main silicone stents are similar to those of the Montgomery T tube, the Westaby, Dumon and Cooper-Hood prostheses. The major indications are malignant tumours and benign stenosis after anastomotic resection or graft. All have in common a degree of narrowing greater than 50%. An initial bronchoscopy enables a precise assessment of the zone to support. The prostheses are then put in place using a rigid bronchoscope. An annual bronchoscopic review is recommended associated with clinical supervision. Their removal is simple even after being in position for a long period. A multicentre study (Marseille, Saint-Etienne, Brescia and Barcelona) report their experience of 1574 prostheses positioned in 1058 patients. The localisation was tracheal (54%), left main bronchus (21%), right main bronchus (18%). The average time in place was 1.2 years for benign tumours(maximum 6.2 years) and four months for malignant tumours (maximum 4.7 years). Complications were rare and included migrations (9.5%), granulomas (7.9%) and obstructions (3.6%). Thanks to their being well tolerated, their simplicity in handling, silicone prostheses are currently an essential choice to re-establish patency of the airways in patients presenting with benign or malignant tracheobronchial pathology.

Keywords

Prosthesis Implantation, Trachea, Silicones, Humans, Bronchi, Stents, Prosthesis Design, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!