
Silicone endoprostheses are used to replace loss of support in tracheobronchial cartilage. The main silicone stents are similar to those of the Montgomery T tube, the Westaby, Dumon and Cooper-Hood prostheses. The major indications are malignant tumours and benign stenosis after anastomotic resection or graft. All have in common a degree of narrowing greater than 50%. An initial bronchoscopy enables a precise assessment of the zone to support. The prostheses are then put in place using a rigid bronchoscope. An annual bronchoscopic review is recommended associated with clinical supervision. Their removal is simple even after being in position for a long period. A multicentre study (Marseille, Saint-Etienne, Brescia and Barcelona) report their experience of 1574 prostheses positioned in 1058 patients. The localisation was tracheal (54%), left main bronchus (21%), right main bronchus (18%). The average time in place was 1.2 years for benign tumours(maximum 6.2 years) and four months for malignant tumours (maximum 4.7 years). Complications were rare and included migrations (9.5%), granulomas (7.9%) and obstructions (3.6%). Thanks to their being well tolerated, their simplicity in handling, silicone prostheses are currently an essential choice to re-establish patency of the airways in patients presenting with benign or malignant tracheobronchial pathology.
Prosthesis Implantation, Trachea, Silicones, Humans, Bronchi, Stents, Prosthesis Design, Follow-Up Studies
Prosthesis Implantation, Trachea, Silicones, Humans, Bronchi, Stents, Prosthesis Design, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
