Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ LAReferencia - Red F...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Positive Psychology Interventions for elderly in Brazil

Authors: Durgante, Helen; Mezejewski, Liriel Weinert; Sá, Caroline Navarine; Dell’Aglio, Débora Dalbosco;

Positive Psychology Interventions for elderly in Brazil

Abstract

La investigación sobre programas de intervención para trabajar fortalezas/virtudes en la promoción de la salud de los adultos mayores/jubilados, todavía es escasa en Brasil. Los objetivos de esta revisión sistemática son identificar: fortalezas/virtudes trabajadas en programas multicomponentes para la promoción de salud de adultos mayores/jubilados en Brasil; criterios de calidad metodológica; y los resultados de estas intervenciones. Se realizó una búsqueda de artículos empíricos (2000-2017) en las bases de dados: SCIELO, BIREME, Pepsic, PsychInfo y Medline. De los 445 artículos, nueve se incluyeron en la revisión. Las principales fortalezas trabajadas fueron: Inteligencia Social/Emocional; Autorregulación/autocontrol; Prudencia/autocuidado; Creatividad y Entusiasmo/Vitalidad. Todos los estudios presentaron efectos favorables para las medidas de resultado primario y dos de ellos para las medidas de resultado secundario.Se constató falta de criterios sistemáticos para la evaluación de los programas. Se discuten los hallazgos en cuanto a la relevancia para futuros diseños de intervención, políticas y servicios para la promoción de la salud.

Pesquisas sobre programas de intervenção que trabalham forças/virtudes para a promoção de saúde de idosos/aposentados ainda são escassas no Brasil. Os objetivos dessa revisão sistemática são identificar: forças/virtudes trabalhadas em programas multicomponentes para promoção de saúde de idosos/aposentados no Brasil; critérios de qualidade metodológica empregados nas intervenções; e resultados dessas intervenções. Realizou-se a busca de artigos empíricos (2000-2017) nas bases de dados SCIELO, BIREME, Pepsic, PsycInfo e Medline. De 445 estudos encontrados, nove foram incluídos na revisão. As principais forças trabalhadas nas intervenções foram: Inteligência social/emocional, Auto-regulação/auto-controle, Prudência/auto-cuidado, Criatividade e Entusiasmo/vitalidade. Todos os estudos apresentaram resultados favoráveis para variáveis de efeito primário, e dois estudos apresentaram resultados para variáveis de efeito secundário. Constatou-se carência de critérios sistemáticos para avaliar a evolução dos programas. Os resultados encontrados contribuem para modelos de intervenção futuros, de políticas e de serviços para promoção de saúde.

Research on intervention programmes aiming to work strengths/virtues for health promotion of the elderly/retirees is still scarce in Brazil. The objectives of this systematic review are to identify: strengths/virtues worked in multicomponent programmes for health promotion of the elderly/retirees in Brazil; methodological quality criteria; and results of these interventions. SCIELO, BIREME, Pepsic, PsychInfo and Medline databases were searched for empiricalarticles (2000-2017). Out of 445 studies, nine were included in the review. The main strengths worked on in the interventions were Social/Emotional Intelligence, Self-regulation/ self-control, Prudence/self-care, Creativity, and Enthusiasm/Vitality. All studies presented favourable effects for primary outcome measures, and two for secondary outcome measures.Lack of systematic criteria for programme evaluation was detected. Findings are discussed as to their relevance for futureintervention designs, policies and services for health promotion.

Keywords

health promotion, promoción de la salud, intervenciones psicológicas positivas, retirees, elderly, strengths/virtues, intervenções psicológicas positivas, forças/virtudes, idosos, psychology interventions, adultos mayores, jubilados, fortalezas/virtudes, aposentados, promoção de saúde

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green