Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Hemorrhoidectomy using a circular stapler].

Authors: A, Levanon; A, Biterman; A, Behar; O, Cohen;

[Hemorrhoidectomy using a circular stapler].

Abstract

We compared traditional local excision of hemorrhoids in 40 patients (group A) with excision using the CDH-33 surgical stapler designed for bowel anastomosis, in 41 (group B). In this technique a purse-string suture is prepared 3 cm above the dentate line, and the stapler is inserted and used to form a mucosa-mucosal anastomosis. This technique is less time-consuming than the traditional technique. Data were collected from patients' medical files and from detailed questionnaires in which symptoms prior to and after operation were reported. Mean ages were 53.0 and 51.5 years and male/female ratios were 1.0:1.2 and 1.0:1.1 respectively, neither significant. The most common complaints in both groups were pain and rectal bleeding. All patients had a lower-GI investigation prior to operation to exclude other causes of rectal bleeding. Recovery averaged 2 months in both groups. Patient satisfaction was assessed by decrease or absence of symptoms on return to normal daily activities. Satisfaction tended to be greater in group B. More patients in group A complained of tightness and discomfort at the operative site, but this was not significant. We are extending our study to a larger number of patients to determine if there are statistically significant differences between the results of the 2 methods.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Pain, Postoperative, Sutures, Anastomosis, Surgical, Middle Aged, Hemorrhoids, Postoperative Complications, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Intestinal Mucosa, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!