
handle: 10852/69692
The topic of this thesis is the system of public advisory commissions in Norway (NOU) and the social networks within that system. Analysing the NOU-system as a social network allows for several unexplored questions to be asked with regard to the structure of the network as a whole. Approaching this in an explorative way, I try to characterize the network structure of the NOU-system and how it changes over time. This is analysed within a Social Network Theory-framework, highlighting tendencies of centralization and cohesion, as well as the aggregated centrality of the network over time. The second question I pose is driven by recent developments of the study of academic expertise in policymaking. Recent studies have shown that within Norwegian advisory commissions there is a growing number of academic experts, giving this particular societal group increased influence in the policy process.Therefore, I aim to find out whether experts are also becoming increasingly important when employing a network-approach.
330, 320
330, 320
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
