Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Maternal Colonization with Group B Streptococcus (GBS). Epidemiology, Microbiology and Clinical Outcomes in the Oslo GBS Study

Authors: Brigtsen, Anne Karin;

Maternal Colonization with Group B Streptococcus (GBS). Epidemiology, Microbiology and Clinical Outcomes in the Oslo GBS Study

Abstract

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a part of the human microbiome and the leading invasive pathogen in newborns. GBS colonizes the intestinal and vaginal tract, and maternal colonization is the most important risk factor for invasive GBS disease in the newborn during the first week of life. A newborn with invasive GBS disease may become severely ill and is at increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment or death. In adults, GBS may cause disease in pregnant women, the immunocompromised and the elderly. In order to quantify the GBS carriage rate and serotype distribution in a contemporary Norwegian population of women at delivery and to investigate the resulting burden of disease, we carried out a prospective cohort study at Oslo University Hospital Ullevål. In this cohort, 25.9% of women giving birth were colonized with GBS. GBS serotype III was the most frequent colonizing strain, followed by types V and Ia in decreasing order of occurrence. We found that 13.8% of the isolates could not be satisfactorily typed using the latex agglutination test, which is the most common phenotypic method for GBS serotyping. In contrast, when applying a combination of capsular genotyping methods, only 0.7% of isolates were not identified. This suggests that a diagnostic genotyping strategy is preferable to serotyping of the GBS polysaccharide capsule in colonized women at delivery. All strains were susceptible to penicillin, but approximately 10% were resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, the drugs of choice for women with penicillin allergy in need of antimicrobial prophylaxis at delivery. We further demonstrated that term infants born to colonized mothers were more than 3 times as likely to be transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit compared with infants of noncolonized mothers. The increased risk of transfer was independent of invasive GBS disease, and a third of the infants met criteria for probable early-onset GBS disease. Examining the effects GBS colonization may have on the mother, we found that colonized mothers were almost twice as likely to be diagnosed with peripartum infection compared to non-colonized mothers, independently of gestational age, premature rupture of membranes and obstetrical interventions like cesarean delivery. Our findings provide evidence that maternal colonization with GBS is associated with a considerably greater burden of neonatal and maternal disease than generally recognized, and gives additional support for improvement of preventive strategies, the most important being the development of an effective GBS vaccine.

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
Keywords

616, 610

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green