Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Legemiddelgjennomganger i sykehjem - en litteraturstudie

Authors: Flatland, Åsne;

Legemiddelgjennomganger i sykehjem - en litteraturstudie

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The number of elderly is increasing, as well as the prescription rate and consumption of drugs in the Norwegian health system. Old, multimorbid patients are often treated with several drugs simultaneously. This, in combination with age-related changes in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, increases the risk of drug-related problems and interactions. Over the last few years there has been an increased focus on interventions to improve pharmacotherapy in Norwegian nursing homes. One of these interventions is medication reviews. Aim: The aim of this thesis is to highlight medication review as a topic. What does the concept include, which tools are relevant, which participants play a role, and what are the effects of medication reviews? Method: Literature review based on PubMed search. Two searches resulted in 29 articles. 10 of these were considered relevant, and included. Four studies were included from the reference-list of other relevant studies. To highlight relevant tools, I found studies based on tools used in the relevant studies, and in Norwegian guidelines. Results: The Norwegian guidelines from The Norwegian Directorate of Health defines medication review as «a systematic approach to assess individual patient drug use, to secure effect and safety» There are a numbers of tools developed to secure better prescription, i.a. the START/STOP-criteria, NorGep-criteria, databases for drug-drug interactions, and a systematic process described for medication reviews. Most studies show a significant effect on outcomes concerning drug-use and drug related problems. Most studies testing health outcomes and hard end-points, however, show no significant effect. The overall quality of the evidence for the outcomes reported is often low. Several studies show a significant effect for medication reviews performed in multidisciplinary teams including a pharmacist. Conclusion: Medication review is an effective intervention for assessing drug-use and to reveal drug-related problems. There is, however, lacking evidence for effect on health outcomes and hard end points. This emphasizes the need for good prospective studies. Several studies claim that the pharmacotherapy in nursing homes should be attended by multidisciplinary teams, including a pharmacist. This will require reorganization, and better routines and collaboration in Norwegian nursing homes.

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
Keywords

610

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities