Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Quality never goes out style : Kvalitetsforbedring av antibiotikaforskrivning ved Sykehuset Asker og Bærum HF

Authors: Draugedalen, Bjørn;

Quality never goes out style : Kvalitetsforbedring av antibiotikaforskrivning ved Sykehuset Asker og Bærum HF

Abstract

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Antibiotic resistance is an increasing problem throughout the world. In Norway the resistance problem is still at a low rate due to a strict antibiotic policy. There has been shown in several studies that inapproriate antibiotic prescription is associated with emergence of resistant strains of bacterias. The aim of this study is to evaluate how good the quality of precribing practice is at the Asker and Bærum hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was conducted at Asker and Bærum hospital. A primary and secondary care hospital with 250 beds, situated twenty kilometers west of Oslo, Norway. There were approx. 34000 hospital admissions in 2006. Prevalence data of antibiotic prescription were collected on six independent days during winter and spring 2007. The patients included in the study received both antibactrial and antimycotic therapy (ATC J01 and J02) on six different wards. Patients receiving profylactic treatment were excluded. In 2006 a local antibiotic guideline booklet were distributed at the hospital. This antibiotic guideline booklet were the golden standard for defining quality of prescibing practice. A flow chart made of specialists in microbiology, infectious disease, anesthetics and with help from international expertise, was the tool to asess the quality of every antibiotic prescription. Strict criterias was used for inclusion of quality indicators in the flow chart. Indication of antibiotic treatment, choice of antibiotics and dosage were the three indicators chosen. These three indicators were then catagorised in subgroups: indication and no indication (I1, I2), choice were divided in choice 1to choice 8(C1-C8) and dosage (D1-D5). RESULTS 464 antibiotic prescriptions made the basis of evaluation. In 92,6 % the antibiotic treatment were justfied (e.g I1). The choice of antibiotic were adequate (C1) in 80,8 %, and the dosage were according to guidelines (D1) in 78,4 %. If we summeries these three indicators, as we did with every drug prescription, we find a total adherence to guidelines at the hospital in 63,4 %. DISCUSSION This study shows that in spite of apparently good antibiotic control in norwegian hospitals, inapproriateness in prescribing practice do occur at a wide range at Asker and Bærum hospital. The study also shows great variability in prescription quality inwards at the hospital. There were significant differencies in quality of prescribing practice between the surgical units and the medical ones. Where the medical units were much more adherent to the local guidelines.

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
Keywords

indremedisin, 610, VDP::770

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green