Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Interfacial strength between molded UHMWPE and PMMA-MMA monomer treated UHMWPE.

Authors: K D, Park; Y H, Kang; J B, Park;

Interfacial strength between molded UHMWPE and PMMA-MMA monomer treated UHMWPE.

Abstract

To solve aseptic loosening of cemented acetabular cup and tibial plateaus of hips and knee joint prostheses in total joint replacement, adhesion between the polymeric prostheses made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and bone cement made of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) has been investigated. Previous studies using xylene, PMMA, and MMA monomer solution to treat bulk surfaces of UHMWPE resulted in 11.5 +/- 0.65 MPa as the maximum interfacial strength between the treated UHMWPE and bone cement. The present study eliminates the use of xylene; instead, UHMWPE powders were treated with MMA monomer and PMMA-MMA solution, dried, and then compression-molded with untreated UHMWPE powders. The interfacial tensile strengths were measured and the best molding conditions investigated by varying temperature, pressure, and time. Temperature was the predominant factor when compared to that of pressure or time. The maximum interfacial strength between the treated UHMWPE and untreated UHMWPE was 16.3 +/- 0.94 MPa with the molding conditions of 166.5 degrees C, 38.7 MPa, and 1 h. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) pictures show the coating of the nodules and fibrils of UHMWPE powder with PMMA. Pulled out aggregated nodular space and coated PMMA after fracture could be seen easily from PMMA-MMA treated UHMWPE powder.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Surface Properties, Bone Cements, Acetabulum, Methylmethacrylate, Prosthesis Failure, Molecular Weight, Polyethylene, Tensile Strength, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Humans, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Hip Prosthesis, Powders

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!