
handle: 10835/19371
En este ensayo se evalúa el efecto de dos formulados bacterianos sobre el rendimiento y la calidad morfológica de los frutos de un cultivo de sandía. Para ello utilizamos dos variedades de sandía, una como variedad principal, Red Jasper, y otra como variedad polinizadora, Gatiño. Utilizamos un diseño de bloques al azar, con 3 tratamientos y cuatro repeticiones y plantas borde. El cultivo fue bajo invernadero, de forma rastrera y con la utilización de un sistema de riego localizado, llegado el momento de la recolección se procedió a la toma de datos de los parámetros a evaluar rendimiento (kg/m2), peso de cada fruto, medición del perímetro, diámetro de la cicatriz pistilar, espesor de la corteza, firmeza de la pulpa, contenido total de sólidos soluble (oBrix), medición del pH y medición del color de la pulpa (L/a/b). Se realizó un análisis de los resultados y no se apreciaron diferencias significativas. This trial evaluates the effect of two bacterial formulations on the yield and morphological quality of the fruits of a watermelon crop. We used two watermelon varieties, one as the main variety, Red Jasper, and the other as the pollinator variety, Gatiño. We used a randomised block design, with three treatments and four replicates and border plants. Culture was carried out in greenhouses, creepers and with the use of a localized irrigation system. At harvest time, parameter data was collected to assess yield (kg/m2), weight of each fruit, perimeter measurement, diameter of the pistillate scar, shell thickness, pulp firmness, total soluble solid content (oBrix), pH measurement and pulp colour measurement (L/a/b). The results were analysed and no significant differences were found.
Evaluación agronómica, Sandía, Crecimiento vegetal, Bacterias
Evaluación agronómica, Sandía, Crecimiento vegetal, Bacterias
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
