Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: predisposing factors, infectious agents and therapy].

Authors: K, Zell; K, Engelmann; A A, Bialasiewicz; G, Richard;

[Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: predisposing factors, infectious agents and therapy].

Abstract

Infectious exogenous endophthalmitis is a serious complication after cataract surgery. Despite modern pharmacological and surgical methods, its treatment is still difficult.In a retrospective study the records of all patients treated for endophthalmitis following cataract extraction at the Department of Ophthalmology of the University Hospital in Hamburg between January 1989 and December 1997 were assessed.Of 36 patients treated for endophthalmitis, 29 (80.6%) had been referred. In 14 (38.9%) of these 29 patients endophthalmitis had occurred after outpatient cataract surgery. Seven patients (19.4%) had been treated as inpatients at the University Eye Hospital Eppendorf. Vitrectomy was performed in 80.6% of the cases. An infectious agent was isolated from 50% of diagnostic probes. The most common organism isolated were coagulase-negative staphylococci (4 cases). Predisposing factors for the development of endophthalmitis were diabetes (27.8%), intraoperative loss of vitreous (19.4%), application of systemic steroids (13.9%) and wound dehiscence (11.1%). Of 27 patients (75%) followed up, 16 (59.3%) had a final visual acuity of 20/400 or better (mean 20/40). An enucleation had to be performed in 4 patients (13.8%).In this study, approximately 60% of patients with endophthalmitis following cataract extraction had their globes preserved and a good visual outcome after appropriate surgical interventions.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Endophthalmitis, Staphylococcus, Visual Acuity, Cataract Extraction, Middle Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Postoperative Complications, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Risk Factors, Vitrectomy, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!