Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[99mTc-Technegas].

Authors: K, Satoh;

[99mTc-Technegas].

Abstract

99mTc-Technegas (Technegas) scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT images, was reviewed in patients who mainly had pulmonary emphysema. The Technegas images showed different degrees of change, from areas of heterogeneity to hot spots or defects. Comparison of planar and SPECT Technegas images revealed that more detailed findings were shown by SPECT than by planar images in mild cases. In more severe cases, the findings of SPECT and planar images were equivalent. In advanced stages, SPECT images should be excluded in favor of planar images. Technegas SPECT could demonstrate ventilation impairment more easily than 133Xe gas dynamic SPECT. The optical average score of Technegas in whole lung correlated well with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0) and FEV1.0/forced vital capacity. Technegas could assess ventilation impairment in pulmonary emphysema more easily than CT, especially in the upper lung field. Technegas was useful for the assessment not only of pulmonary emphysema but also of other diseases. For the quantitative evaluation of Technegas, some investigators study three-dimensional fractal analysis or mean voxel values of the lung. These quantitative analyses are useful for classifying clinical stage and comparing cases.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Pulmonary Emphysema, Humans, Female, Radiopharmaceuticals, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Asthma, Sodium Pertechnetate Tc 99m

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!