Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Minimally invasive adrenalectomy with posterior retroperitoneoscopy].

Authors: A, Balogh; L, Varga; J, Julesz; G, Lázár; K, Martin;

[Minimally invasive adrenalectomy with posterior retroperitoneoscopy].

Abstract

Authors report a total of 14 adrenalectomies performed from a posterior (lumbotomy) approach, using minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic technique. The "UltraCision" scalpel, an ultrasound activated cutter-coagulation device has been used for operative tissue dissection. Two cases were converted. The mean operating time of the successful 12 cases were 128 minutes. No mortality and no septic complication occurred. The mean operative blood loss of the 12 procedures were less than 100 ml. The mean hospitalisation was 3-5 days, and the complete recovery needed 2-3 weeks. On the basis of our own experiences and the ones of prospective, randomized clinical studies of the literature, the retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy from a posterior approach is recommended for the surgical treatment of benign tumours of the suprarenal gland with a size less than 5 cm diameter. The low conversion- and complication-rate, the minimal operative blood loss, the short hospitalization and quick recovery time all are the advantages of this method. It can be performed after previous abdominal operation and in cases with morbid obesity. The technique is suitable for bilateral adrenalectomies as well. This method is not justified for the removal of malignant and/or larger than 5 cm adrenal tumours. Coagulopathies are contraindications.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Blood Loss, Surgical, Adrenalectomy, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Female, Laparoscopy, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!