
handle: 10810/69190
It is a widely held belief that a computational architecture based on quantum systems will bring forth major technological advances in a plethora of fields whose names significantly overlap with information technology buzzwords. While it is true that there are some problems where quantum algorithms could offer significant advantage, these problems are somewhat narrow, and to make generalist claims of quantum speedup in machine learning, artificial intelligence and pattern recognition we should read the fine print of actual requirements to load information into quantum systems (S. Aaronson, 2015). However, what if the quantum advantage were built into the loading itself? Is that even possible, in terms of information? Most quantum algorithms employ amplitude encodings or basis encodings to load classical information into quantum systems. However, a straightforward approach to encode information that must later be retrieved is an observable encoding, where classical data is associated to the outcome of observables measured over a quantum state. One of the novel aspects of this type of encoding is the natural extension to multiple measurement bases and introducing measurement-basis choice as part of a quantum algorithm. In the literature, similar encodings have been explored for quantum generative models of quantum statistics with Boltzmann and Born machines, but the most explicit scheme based on an observable encoding is a Quantum Random Access Code (QRAC), where choosing an observable to measure allows to retrieve a fragment of the encoded information with some success probability. QRACs have been shown to showcase advantage over their classical counterpart, but have only been studied in depth up to n = 3 qubits, due to the mathematical complexity of constructing a class of many-qubit observables organized into unbiased bases.
170 p.
theoretical physics, nuclear physics
theoretical physics, nuclear physics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
