Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
PubliCattarrow_drop_down
PubliCatt
Conference object . 2008
Data sources: PubliCatt
addClaim

Ascospore maturation and discharge in Erysiphe necator

Authors: Caffi, Tito; Cavagna, Silvia; Rossi, Vittorio;

Ascospore maturation and discharge in Erysiphe necator

Abstract

Ascospores of Erysiphe necator are a relevant source of inoculum for spring infections. They form within chasmothecia (formerly named cleistothecia) which develop on the affected grapevine tissue in late summer to autumn, disperse to the bark by rain-splashes, and overwinter. Naturally dispersed chasmothecia were collected at 15-day intervals from ripening to complete leaf fall, in 2005 and 2006. Chasmothecia were placed on the bark of trunk pieces, overwintered outside, and observed weekly for the developmental stage and for discharged ascospores until the end of June. During leaf fall, 56% of chasmothecia had mature ascospores, 26% had immature ascospores, while 18% were unfilled (undifferentiated or empty). During winter (complete leaf fall to bud break) the distribution of chasmothecia in the three classes was 12%, 34%, and 28%, respectively, while after bud break it was 3%, 30%, and 67%, respectively. 35% of ascospores were discharged before complete leaf fall, 7% during winter (especially soon after leaf fall), and 58% after bud break. 55% of the total ascospores discharged before complete leaf fall were released from the earliest group of chasmothecia collected, 38% and 4% from the following groups, while no ascospores were discharged from the latest chasmothecia. These result showed that in northern Italy the development of chasmothecia depends on the period of their formation, resulting in two distinct periods of ascospore discharge in autumn and spring, as previously observed in Australia but not found in the state of New York. These findings may be relevant to disease epidemiology and management.

Country
Italy
Keywords

inoculum for sping infections, ascospore, Erysiphe necator, grapevine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!