Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Tidsskrift for Den n...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

[Arthrocentesis in rheumatology practice].

Authors: H, Hartmann;

[Arthrocentesis in rheumatology practice].

Abstract

This study of Norwegian rheumatologists' use of intraarticular steroid injections is based on a survey among members of the Norwegian Society for Rheumatology. 79% of the members responded, i.e. 108 rheumatologists. 69 reported having used intraarticular steroid injections in any joint during the last week, a total of 637 times. There have been no previous studies on this subject in Norway. The results show that Norwegian rheumatologists consider intraarticular steroid injections a very effective treatment. Only 9% reported that they had seen side effects over the last 12 months (a total of 51 side effects), of which post-injection pain and subcutaneous atrophy were the most common. There were no reports of septic arthritis. Almost all side effects were considered not serious.

Keywords

Attitude of Health Personnel, Norway, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Injections, Intra-Articular, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Treatment Outcome, Surveys and Questionnaires, Synovial Fluid, Humans, Paracentesis, Steroids, Practice Patterns, Physicians'

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Published in a Diamond OA journal