Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Repositorio Instituc...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Diagnóstico de nivel de madurez de la gerencia de proyectos de I+D+I en Cotecmar

Authors: Angulo Carvajal, Vanessa; Flórez Ramos, Rodrigo José;

Diagnóstico de nivel de madurez de la gerencia de proyectos de I+D+I en Cotecmar

Abstract

El objetivo de esta investigación es medir el nivel de madurez en la gestión de proyectos de I+D+i en la empresa Cotecmar. Debido a que no se encontró una metodología estandarizada, para esta medición fue necesario elaborar un instrumento basado en prácticas extraídas de la Guía PMBOK versión 7, del PMI, hacer una revisión de literatura de proyectos de I+D+i (rastreo bibliográfico por medio del uso de operadores booleanos) y consolidar las opiniones de 17 expertos pertenecientes a Cotecmar. Posterior a la elaboración del instrumento se llevó a cabo una validación de unidimensionalidad y confiabilidad. Esta validación arrojó como resultado parámetros aceptables. Para el diseño del instrumento se utilizó una escala de Likert, que permitió hacerles una valoración cuantitativa a los criterios de medición que componen el instrumento. Como resultado de la aplicación del instrumento se logró diagnosticar el nivel de madurez de la gestión de proyecto de I+D+i de Cotecmar, que arrojó como nivel general de madurez 1, que significa una inmadurez común, lo que quiere decir que las prácticas evaluadas al interior de la Corporación se encuentran implementadas formalmente, pero que estas no se controlan, no se miden, ni se les hace mejora continua. Una de las principales recomendaciones de esta investigación hace referencia a actualizar el Manual de gestión de proyectos de I+D+i de Cotecmar, con el fin mejorar su nivel de madurez partiendo desde el nivel actual. Dos de las limitaciones encontradas corresponden a la imposibilidad de encontrar un instrumento adecuado para medir la madurez de la gestión de proyectos de I+D+i y al bajo número de expertos consultados durante la aplicación del instrumento diseñado, 17 en total, y a la doble participación de cinco expertos en los ejercicios de priorización y evaluación de congruencia y relevancia. Finalmente, se espera que este proceso investigativo no solo le sirva como instrumento de consulta a Cotecmar, sino que sea un aporte específico en la gestión de proyectos de I+D+i, al diseñar e implementar una herramienta que es capaz de medir la madurez en esta área de conocimiento.

The objective of this research is to measure the level of maturity in the management of R+D+i projects in the company Cotecmar. Given that no standardized methodology was found, for this measurement it was necessary to develop an instrument based on practices extracted from the PMI’s PMBOK Guide, version 7, to make a literature review of R+D+i projects (bibliographic search through the use of Boolean operators) and to consolidate the opinions of 17 experts in Cotecmar. After the elaboration of the instrument, a confirmation of one-dimensionality and reliability was carried out. This validation yielded acceptable parameters as a result. For the design of the instrument, a Likert scale that allows a quantitative assessment of the measurement criteria that make up the instrument was used. As a result of the application of the instrument, it was possible to diagnose the level of maturity of the R&D+i project management in Cotecmar, which yielded a general maturity level of 1, which means a common immaturity, which means that the practices evaluated within the Corporation are formally implemented, but these are not controlled, measured, or continuously improved. One of the main recommendation of this research suggests to updating Cotecmar's R&D+I Project Management Manual, in order to improve its level of maturity starting from the current level. Two of the limitations found correspond to the impossibility of finding an adequate instrument to measure the maturity of R&D&i project management and to the low number of experts consulted during the application of the designed instrument, 17 in total, and to the double participation of 5 experts in the exercises of prioritization and evaluation of congruence and relevance. Finally, this investigative process is expected not only to serve as a consultation tool for Cotecmar, but also as a refence for assessing management of R+D+i projects, by designing and implementing a tool that is capable of measuring maturity in this area of knowledge.

Magíster en Gerencia de Proyectos

Maestría

Country
Colombia
Related Organizations
Keywords

Mejora Continua, ADMINISTRACIÓN DE PROYECTOS, Continuous Improvement, Gestion de Proyectos I+D+i, Madurez, Maturity, EVALUACIÓN DE PROYECTOS, R&D&I Project Management, GERENTES, TOMA DE DECISIONES

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green