Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Repositorio Instituc...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Diferencias respecto a la performance de los activos financieros versus activos convencionales

Authors: Piedrahita Muñoz, Estefania;

Diferencias respecto a la performance de los activos financieros versus activos convencionales

Abstract

En este Trabajo Final de Master (TFM) se realiza un análisis que compara la performance de los activos de inversión convencionales y los activos de inversión sostenibles, específicamente, su rendimiento y de riesgo. Para ello se utilizan indicadores como la razón de Sharpe, la ratio de Treynor, el alfa de Jensen y los indicadores de riesgo que se analizan a través del índice de volatilidad y la beta. Se obtiene que los fondos convencionales han generado un 0.28% más de rentabilidad total promedio a lo largo de los últimos seis años, lo que supone una diferencia muy pequeña. El estudio finalmente concluye que los fondos de inversión sostenible, muestran rentabilidades muy cercanas a sus oponentes los fondos tradicionales, a pesar de que los factores ESG afectan su selección de valores, lo que supone un riesgo mayor para dichas carteras.

In this Final Master's Project (TFM) an analysis is carried out that compares the performance of conventional investment assets and sustainable investment assets, specifically, their profitability and level of risk. For this, indicators such as the Sharpe ratio, the Treynor ratio, Jensen's alpha and risk indicators that are analyzed through the volatility index and beta are used. It is obtained those conventional funds have generated 0.28% more than average total return over the last six years, which is a very small difference. The study finally concludes that sustainable investment funds show returns very close to their opponents in traditional funds, despite the fact that ESG factors affect their selection of values, which implies a greater risk for these portfolios.

Magíster en Administración Financiera

Maestría

Country
Colombia
Related Organizations
Keywords

Ratio de Treynor, Activo sostenible, Activo ESG, PORTAFOLIO DE INVERSIONES, Ratio de Sharpe, Performance, Principios para la Inversión Responsable (PRI), PRODUCTO INTERNO BRUTO, Vehículo financiero, Criterios ESG, Instrumentos de inversión, Activo tradicional, ACCIONES (BOLSA), RIESGO (FINANZAS), Alpha de Jensen, Fondo ETF, Activo convencional, RENTABILIDAD, Regresión lineal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green