Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Experiences with the alloplastic joint prosthesis of the interphalangeal joint].

Authors: E, Lang; A, Schmidt; A, Ishida; H, Baumgärtler;

[Experiences with the alloplastic joint prosthesis of the interphalangeal joint].

Abstract

The replacement of finger joints, especially of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), remains an unsolved problem. Long-term results of conventional reconstructive procedures as well as previously available artificial joint implants have been disappointing. In a controlled study, 12 PIP-joints were replaced by a new type of total endoprosthesis as an alternative to joint fusion. The cementless prosthesis is unhinged and consists of metal joint surfaces. After a follow-up of 18 months, implantation of this metal prosthesis resulted in almost complete pain relief and an active range of movement of 58 degrees. The absolute gain in mobility, however, was only 6 degrees. A swan-neck deformity was found in nine out of 12 cases but corrective surgery was not required. The proximal half of the implant had to be exchanged in two cases due to loosening. All patients were satisfied with the result. The disparity between subjective acceptance by the patients, who clearly prefer joint replacement to fusion, and objective results demonstrates the necessity for further development in this field. The type of prosthesis used in this study seems to be a useful baseline tool which could be turned into a ingenious PIP-joint replacement by further development aiming at reduced abrasion, increased initial stability, a more individual configuration, to name just a few goals.

Keywords

Reoperation, Foreign-Body Reaction, Hand Injuries, Prosthesis Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Metacarpophalangeal Joint, Radiography, Postoperative Complications, Finger Joint, Finger Injuries, Osteoarthritis, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!