
The replacement of finger joints, especially of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP), remains an unsolved problem. Long-term results of conventional reconstructive procedures as well as previously available artificial joint implants have been disappointing. In a controlled study, 12 PIP-joints were replaced by a new type of total endoprosthesis as an alternative to joint fusion. The cementless prosthesis is unhinged and consists of metal joint surfaces. After a follow-up of 18 months, implantation of this metal prosthesis resulted in almost complete pain relief and an active range of movement of 58 degrees. The absolute gain in mobility, however, was only 6 degrees. A swan-neck deformity was found in nine out of 12 cases but corrective surgery was not required. The proximal half of the implant had to be exchanged in two cases due to loosening. All patients were satisfied with the result. The disparity between subjective acceptance by the patients, who clearly prefer joint replacement to fusion, and objective results demonstrates the necessity for further development in this field. The type of prosthesis used in this study seems to be a useful baseline tool which could be turned into a ingenious PIP-joint replacement by further development aiming at reduced abrasion, increased initial stability, a more individual configuration, to name just a few goals.
Reoperation, Foreign-Body Reaction, Hand Injuries, Prosthesis Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Metacarpophalangeal Joint, Radiography, Postoperative Complications, Finger Joint, Finger Injuries, Osteoarthritis, Humans
Reoperation, Foreign-Body Reaction, Hand Injuries, Prosthesis Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Metacarpophalangeal Joint, Radiography, Postoperative Complications, Finger Joint, Finger Injuries, Osteoarthritis, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
