
This study focused on the compressive properties of two core buildup materials, Ti-Core, (EDS, Inc.) and FluoroCore, (L.D. Caulk). Specimens were 0.6 x 1.2 cm cylinders, Prior to testing, the specimens were aged in a moist environment for one, seven, or 28 day(s). The properties of interest were compressive strength, modulus of elasticity and toughness. The data set for each of the three compressive properties was subjected to a separate two-way analysis of variance. Scheffé F-tests were used to compare means. Whereas the effect of material on each of the three properties was significant (p 0.400) and material x specimen age (p > 0.350) were not significant. FluoroCore was stronger and tougher than Ti-Core. On the other hand, Ti-Core displayed the highest stiffness, but ruptured brittley. The moderately low strength of Ti-Core, and the insufficient elastic modulus of FluoroCore, avert favorable recommendations pertaining to the construction of foundation restorations.
Analysis of Variance, Compressive Strength, Hardness, Materials Testing, Fluorides, Topical, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Composite Resins, Elasticity
Analysis of Variance, Compressive Strength, Hardness, Materials Testing, Fluorides, Topical, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Composite Resins, Elasticity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
