
handle: 10722/220367
INTRODUCTION: Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) mainly occurs at L4-L5. The phenotype and critical values of facet joint (FJ) angulation and tropism (FJs angulation asymmetry) in relation to DS remain controversial. The study addressed the role of FJ angulation and tropism in relation to L4-L5 DS in the Asia Pacific region. METHODS: An international cross-sectional study was performed in 33 institutions of single level DS. Imaging assessment consisted of identifying the DS level and left/right L4-L5 FJ angulations. Patients were stratified to those without (Group A) or with L4-L5 DS (Group B). ROC and multivariate analyses were performed, assessing the FJ angulation profile and tropism in relation to DS. RESULTS: The study included 349 patients (63% females; mean age: 61.8 years). Group B had greater sagittal FJ angulation than Group A (p<0.001). 58 degrees or greater significantly increased the risk of DS (unilateral FJ: OR:2.5; 95% CI:1.2-5.5; bilateral FJ: OR:5.9; 95% CI:2.7-13.2; p<0.001). FJ tropism was found to be relevant between 16-24 degrees angulation difference (OR:5.6; 95% CI:1.2-26.1). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the largest studies to address the role of FJ angulation and tropism in relation to L4-L5 DS. Greater FJ angulation was associated with DS, with a critical value of ≥58 degrees increasing DS risk for unilateral and bilateral facet involvement. Specific FJT ranges were related to DS. This study further broadens the understanding of the phenotype of facet joint orientation in relation to DS.
Session: Free Papers Lumbar Spine 2: abstract no. 39935
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
