
handle: 10722/137598
We study competitive bidding with an explicit bid floor, motivated by minimum wage legislation and minimum labor standards. We derive the equilibrium strategies in, and compare the expected procurement costs among, the first-price, second-price, English, and Dutch auctions in a private-cost model. For the English auction, we also consider a variant in which each seller can terminate the auction by jumping down to sell at the price floor. We find that the first-price auction and the aforementioned jump-down English auction lead to a lower expected procurement cost than under the second-price auction and the standard English auction. © IAET.
link_to_subscribed_fulltext
Minimum wage, Competitive bidding, Revenue, Bid floor
Minimum wage, Competitive bidding, Revenue, Bid floor
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
