
handle: 10722/127320 , 10722/127313 , 10722/141032
Structured financial products including credit-linked notes and collateralized debt obligations were popular before the credit crisis but then delivered substantial loss to investors. Driver for investment decision in those products is key to understanding the fundamental causes of the crisis. Classical portfolio theory suggests that investors would shun away from unfamiliar financial products. This familiarity bias holds especially for unsophisticated household investors. The rapid growth of structured products market, the newest financial innovations, presents an opportune setting to test such conventional wisdoms. Using unique household investment data from Hong Kong, we show that product distributors' selling intensity is an important determinant for investors' allocation in structured products. On the other hand, more financially literate investors, who are more capable of optimizing asset allocation, include less structured products into their portfolios. Important determinants according to mean-variance analysis, such as product premium, have little explanatory power to investor's allocation decisions. Our finding suggests that investments in structured products prior to the credit crisis were more likely to be pulled by distributors. This paper demonstrates the importance of financial literacy for investment decisions.
The 2010 Annual Meeting of the Financial Management Association (FMA), New York, N.Y., 20-23 October 2010.
Session 175 - Crisis: Individual Investors
postprint
Financial literacy, Ambiguity aversion, Structured products
Financial literacy, Ambiguity aversion, Structured products
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
