Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Prognosis and course].

Authors: H H, Jensen; S F, Hussain; P H, Pedersen; B, Andreasson;

[Atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Prognosis and course].

Abstract

The treatment of patients with the diagnosis atypical endometrial hyperplasia has been disputed during the last decades. The aim of the study was to evaluate the treatment of these patients and analyse the progression rate to invasive carcinoma of the endometrium. Fifty-seven patients with atypical hyperplasia were examined and treated from 1976 through 1991. The medical records were examined retrospectively and the pathology slides were revised by one pathologist in accordance with the 1975 WHO recommendations. Thirty-one (54%) patients were on oestrogen treatment as monotherapy at the time of diagnosis. Forty-two patients had a hysterectomy performed within five months, and five patients had a hysterectomy performed 10 to 61 months after diagnosis. A total of 18 out of 57 patients (31.6%) had or developed endometrial carcinoma all with myometrial invasion: 14 stage I with 50% myometrial invasion, and one stage IV. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, parity or hormone replacement treatment between the group with endometrial carcinoma and the group without endometrial carcinoma. We conclude that unopposed oestrogen treatment and nulliparity are the main risk factors for atypical hyperplasia and that hysterectomy is the appropriate treatment for patients with atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium.

Keywords

Adult, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Middle Aged, Hysterectomy, Prognosis, Body Mass Index, Endometrial Neoplasms, Parity, Risk Factors, Endometrial Hyperplasia, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!