Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Acta Virologicaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Acta Virologica
Article . 2000
addClaim

Efficacy of a combination vaccine containing MDV CVI 988 strain and HVT against challenge with very virulent MDV.

Authors: H J, Geerligs; M W, Weststrate; T L, Pertile; J, Rodenberg; M, Kumar; S, Chu;

Efficacy of a combination vaccine containing MDV CVI 988 strain and HVT against challenge with very virulent MDV.

Abstract

With the emergence of very virulent Marek's disease virus (MDV) strains, vaccines based on herpesvirus of turkeys (HVT) appear to be not powerful enough to confer full protection, whereas in chicken flocks vaccinated with MDV CVI 988 strain protective immunity sometimes is generated not early enough for full protection. For this reason combination vaccines containing HVT as well as CVI 988 have been developed. In this paper the beneficial effect of combining both types of virus strains in one vaccine for early protection is shown in a vaccination challenge experiment, in which one-day-old chickens were vaccinated with suboptimal dosages of the monovalent vaccines and the same dosages in a combination vaccine. After 5 days the chickens were challenged with a very virulent MDV strain and subsequently observed for a period of approx. 50 days. It appeared that the combination vaccine provided better early protection than the monovalent vaccines. In addition, the combination vaccine was tested as vaccine administered in ovo. It appeared that after in ovo vaccination the vaccine conferred adequate protection against challenge with a very virulent MDV strain, 5 days after hatch, and that protection after in ovo vaccination was similar to that obtained after subcutaneous vaccination with the same combination vaccine.

Keywords

Turkeys, Virulence, Vaccination, Viral Vaccines, Gammaherpesvirinae, Marek Disease, Animals, Vaccines, Combined, Chickens, Herpesvirus 2, Gallid

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
gold